Future Shock (1970)
The original naming event behind the book's title and its revision.
When Reality Gets Outsourced
The future does not arrive anymore. It autocompletes.
AI Euphoria, AI Nausea, and the Fight to Remain the Author of Your Own Life
agency shock: too many realities, too many agents, too little authorship.
30 Sources' Atlas
The original naming event behind the book's title and its revision.
How to Reclaim Our Humanity in an Age of Machine Thinking.
The strongest public benchmark for capabilities, deployment, investment, and governance gaps.
A foundational text on companionship without reciprocity and technologically mediated solitude.
Re-materializes AI into minerals, labor, logistics, energy, and planetary cost.
When the future stops arriving and starts autocompleting you.
The system runs on misaligned temporal regimes, not on one single speed.
Authorship erodes in the private life of language, attention, proof, and feeling.
The market rewrites desire, status, intimacy, and the price of staying recognizably human.
AI becomes office mutiny, planetary infrastructure, geopolitical friction, and swarm behavior.
The answer is not unplugging. It is reclaiming authorship through the Agency Stack.
Featured concepts
Agency shock is the book's central wound: the growing distance between actions happening and the felt sense that they were authored by you.
The modern wound is not speed alone. It is the collision of five incompatible tempos: compute, institutions, climate, demography, and the biological human body.
Shared reality erodes when proof loses the power to settle disputes and people inhabit separately rendered worlds.
The market turns the self into a scoreboard that offers only two identities: winner by exponential scale or failure by comparison.
Shadow AI is the quiet use of machine systems ahead of permission, policy, or institutional blessing.
The Agency Stack is the book's anti-framework: intent, provenance, friction by design, the human premium, and resilient communities.
Provenance
The provenance note traces the inquiry back to political science studies and a thesis about information and communication technologies in the construction of political reality.
The planned doctoral path at Moscow State University extended the same inquiry into public administration, territory, and trust, but the formal defense never arrived.
Building licensed financial institutions and writing regulatory frameworks became a practical continuation of the same question: how institutions construct trust and legibility.
Futuroshock becomes the delayed public defense: not a pivot away from finance into cultural commentary, but a return to a twenty-year inquiry under the pressure of AI.
The dissertation I never defended
The provenance note turns biography into method. The book does not present itself as a detached forecasting object; it presents itself as the latest submission in a long, interrupted investigation into how technology constructs reality, trust, and political feeling.
Public sociology, not prophecy
The academic framing positions the project in the line of public sociology and futures writing without pretending to be a conventional peer-reviewed monograph. Its wager is diagnosis plus vocabulary, not prediction.
With AI, not by it
The manuscript openly states that the book was written with AI, but argues that authorship can survive co-creation only through strict intentional practice. The site should stage that tension rather than hide it.
Slides, maps, and atmosphere from the working archive.
You do not have to win the future.